
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro CX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+2044.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10645.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Quadro CX
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (947 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌401% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro CX
2008Why buy it
- ✅+2044.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10645.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (947 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌401% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro CX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro CX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 11 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro CX

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro CX
Quadro CX
The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro CX's 947 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 2044.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+2045% | 947 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+2433% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+3404% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 80+233% | 24 |
| TMUs | 152+138% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+2005% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro CX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+2005% | 0.19 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs None (Quadro CX). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro CX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro CX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 150W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+1513% | 6.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 80% less ($1600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 (Quadro CX) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 10080% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-80% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+10080% | 0.5 |
| Codename | GA104 | GT200B |
| Release | December 1 2020 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #73 | #901 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












