
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro K1200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+585.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 415.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌344.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 45W.
Quadro K1200
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 200W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,965 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro K1200
2015Why buy it
- ✅+585.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 415.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 200W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌344.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,965 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro K1200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K1200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 33 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro K1200

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200
The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro K1200's 2,965 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 585.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro K1200 uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 512 (Quadro K1200). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+585% | 2,965 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+850% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+1431% | 1.0578 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+61% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 152+375% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+1820% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K1200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro K1200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro K1200's 45W — a 126.5% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K1200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 45W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+54% | 65.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro K1200 launched at $300. The Quadro K1200 costs 24.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 9.9 (Quadro K1200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 414.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $300-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+414% | 9.9 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM107 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 28 2015 |
| Ranking | #73 | #586 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












