G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro K2000D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro K2000D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅1336.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1805.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌292.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 51W.
❌19.8% longer card at 242mm vs 202mm.

Quadro K2000D

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 51W instead of 200W, a 149W reduction.
✅Measures 202mm instead of 242mm, a 40mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
50.1% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1336.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1169.5% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 1,600), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1805.8% (50.9 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro K2000D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro K2000D

The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro K2000D's 1,600 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 1169.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro K2000D uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 (Quadro K2000D). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro K2000D
G3D Mark Score	20,312+1170%	1,600
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4864+1167%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+2111%	0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs	80+400%	16
TMUs	152+375%	32
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+15900%	0.03 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2000D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro K2000D
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000D carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 64-bit on the Quadro K2000D. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro K2000D) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro K2000D
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro K2000D
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro K2000D
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro K2000D's 51W — a 118.7% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K2000D). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 202mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro K2000D
TDP	200W	51W-75%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	202mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80
Perf/Watt	101.6+224%	31.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the Quadro K2000D launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti was 33.4% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.7 (Quadro K2000D) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1785.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro K2000D
MSRP	$399-33%	$599
Performance per Dollar	50.9+1785%	2.7
Codename	GA104	GK107
Release	December 1 2020	March 1 2013
Ranking	#73	#750

Search GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon

Search Quadro K2000D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.