
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro K5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+409.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3089.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌63.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 122W.
Quadro K5000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 122W instead of 200W, a 78W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,989 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro K5000
2012Why buy it
- ✅+409.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3089.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 122W instead of 200W, a 78W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌63.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 122W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,989 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro K5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 45 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 24 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro K5000

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro K5000
Quadro K5000
The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro K5000's 3,989 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 409.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro K5000 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5000). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 706 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+409% | 3,989 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+217% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+647% | 2.169 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+136% | 706 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+19% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+3592% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12_0 (Quadro K5000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K5000). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro K5000's 122W — a 48.4% difference. The Quadro K5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 122W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+211% | 32.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro K5000 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 84% less ($2100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.6 (Quadro K5000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 3081.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-84% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+3081% | 1.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | GK104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 17 2012 |
| Ranking | #73 | #492 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












