
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro M2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+373% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 492.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
Quadro M2200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,294 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro M2200
2017Why buy it
- ✅+373% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 492.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,294 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro M2200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M2200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 48 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro M2200

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro M2200's 4,294 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 373%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro M2200 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,024 (Quadro M2200). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1036 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+373% | 4,294 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+375% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+663% | 2.122 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+61% | 1036 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+138% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+1163% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M2200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2200). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 2nd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 2nd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro M2200's 55W — a 113.7% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro M2200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 55W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+30% | 78.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro M2200 launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 20.2% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.6 (Quadro M2200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 491.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-20% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+492% | 8.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM206 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #479 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












