
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅131.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $392 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 502.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌98.2% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅131.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $392 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 502.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌98.2% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro M4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 30 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 46 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro M4000

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro M4000's 6,679 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 204.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+204% | 6,679 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+280% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+549% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+64% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+90% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+921% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) — a 112.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+112% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 82°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-9% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+52% | 66.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 49.6% less ($392 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.4 (Quadro M4000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 506% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-50% | $791 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+506% | 8.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM204 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #73 | #392 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












