GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro M520

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+961.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 432.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.

Quadro M520

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,913 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Quadro M520

2017

Why buy it

✅+961.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 432.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,913 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro M520?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 1,913 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Quadro M520 is a 2017 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017, 961.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about 99.5% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and you are getting 961.8% higher G3D Mark. Quadro M520 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro M520 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro M520 is 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 1,913 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro M520 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro M520
1080p
low	152 FPS	33 FPS
medium	137 FPS	20 FPS
high	118 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	7 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	20 FPS
medium	107 FPS	12 FPS
high	91 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	3 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	8 FPS
medium	65 FPS	6 FPS
high	50 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro M520

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro M520
1080p
low	425 FPS	71 FPS
medium	366 FPS	45 FPS
high	296 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	20 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	20 FPS
medium	229 FPS	15 FPS
high	190 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	6 FPS
medium	114 FPS	4 FPS
high	96 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro M520

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro M520
1080p
low	859 FPS	86 FPS
medium	693 FPS	69 FPS
high	602 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	65 FPS
medium	529 FPS	52 FPS
high	452 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	43 FPS
medium	346 FPS	34 FPS
high	275 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro M520

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro M520
1080p
low	580 FPS	84 FPS
medium	514 FPS	68 FPS
high	424 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	15 FPS
medium	427 FPS	12 FPS
high	335 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	11 FPS
medium	266 FPS	8 FPS
high	234 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Quadro M520

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro M520

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro M520

The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro M520's 1,913 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 961.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro M520 uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 (Quadro M520). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1019 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro M520
G3D Mark Score	20,312+962%	1,913
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4864+1167%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+1926%	0.7995 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+63%	1019 MHz
ROPs	80+900%	8
TMUs	152+850%	16
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+3592%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M520 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro M520
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M520 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro M520) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro M520
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro M520's 25W — a 155.6% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro M520). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Quadro M520
TDP	200W	25W-88%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	—
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	101.6+33%	76.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro M520 launched at $200. The Quadro M520 costs 49.9% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 9.6 (Quadro M520) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 430.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).