
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+351.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌400% higher power demand at 200W vs 40W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 242mm vs 145mm.
Quadro P1000
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 200W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 242mm, a 97mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,495 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro P1000
2017Why buy it
- ✅+351.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 200W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 242mm, a 97mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌400% higher power demand at 200W vs 40W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 242mm vs 145mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,495 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro P1000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P1000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 51 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro P1000

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P1000's 4,495 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 351.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1519 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+352% | 4,495 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+660% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+942% | 1.555 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+10% | 1519 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 152+375% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+2426% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P1000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro P1000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 40W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 145mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 112.4+11% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro P1000 launched at $0. The Quadro P1000 costs 100+% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs Infinity (Quadro P1000) — the Quadro P1000 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA104 | GP107 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #466 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












