
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+116.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 132.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌20.4% longer card at 242mm vs 201mm.
Quadro P2200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 201mm instead of 242mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,386 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌7.5% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro P2200
2019Why buy it
- ✅+116.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 132.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 201mm instead of 242mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌20.4% longer card at 242mm vs 201mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,386 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌7.5% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro P2200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro P2200

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P2200's 9,386 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 116.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1493 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+116% | 9,386 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+280% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+324% | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+12% | 1493 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+100% | 40 |
| TMUs | 152+90% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+921% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+220% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P2200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 has 5 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+60% | 5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+220% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 201mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 125.1+23% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 7% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 21.9 (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 132.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-7% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+132% | 21.9 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP106 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | June 10 2019 |
| Ranking | #73 | #281 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












