
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+212.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,500 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro P3200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅+212.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,500 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro P3200 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P3200 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 73 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro P3200 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 6,500 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 212.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1404 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+212% | 6,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+171% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+222% | 5.032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+19% | 1404 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+36% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+627% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+17% | 86.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #73 | #292 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












