
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+170.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,500 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro P4000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅+170.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,500 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro P4000 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P4000 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 84 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro P4000 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1114 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P4000 Max-Q's 7,500 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 170.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P4000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4.401 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1228 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+171% | 7,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+171% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+268% | 4.401 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+36% | 1228 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+36% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+627% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P4000 Max-Q's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+35% | 75.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #298 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












