
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅115.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro P4200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅115.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro P4200 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P4200 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 50 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 88 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro P4200 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,800 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P4200 Max-Q's 7,800 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 160.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P4200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6.82 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+160% | 7,800 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+111% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+138% | 6.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+13% | 1480 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+6% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+471% | 0.84 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P4200 Max-Q's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+30% | 78.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #73 | #234 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












