
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+59.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 899.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,728 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅+59.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 899.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,728 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro P5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 77 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 111 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro P5000

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P5000's 12,728 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 59.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+60% | 12,728 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+138% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+83% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1733 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 160+5% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+411% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+56% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 10.5% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 180W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+44% | 70.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 84% less ($2100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.1 (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 898% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-84% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+898% | 5.1 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #73 | #206 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












