GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro P6000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P6000

2016Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro P6000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro P6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro P6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • 8.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $5,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1868.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

  • 193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2016 hardware with 23 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1403.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 30.9% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 15,512), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 16nm, 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,600 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $5,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1868.8% (50.9 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro P6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

Quadro P6000

The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P6000's 15,512 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 30.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiQuadro P6000
G3D Mark Score
20,312+31%
15,512
Architecture
Ampere
Pascal
Process Node
8 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
4864+27%
3840
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS+28%
12.63 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+1%
1645 MHz
ROPs
80
96+20%
TMUs
152
240+58%
L1 Cache
4.8 MB+243%
1.4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiQuadro P6000
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 carries 23 GB. Quadro P6000 gives you 193% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 384-bit on the Quadro P6000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiQuadro P6000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
23.438 GB+193%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s+4%
432 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
384-bit+50%
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiQuadro P6000
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiQuadro P6000
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiQuadro P6000
TDP
200W-20%
250W
Recommended PSU
600W-8%
650W
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
267mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
101.6+64%
62.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti was 93.3% cheaper ($5600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.6 (Quadro P6000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1857.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiQuadro P6000
MSRP
$399-93%
$5999
Performance per Dollar
50.9+1858%
2.6
Codename
GA104
GP102
Release
December 1 2020
October 1 2016
Ranking
#73
#141

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.