
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅421.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 134% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌400% higher power demand at 200W vs 40W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 242mm vs 145mm.
Quadro P620
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 200W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 242mm, a 97mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro P620
2018Why buy it
- ✅421.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 134% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 200W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 242mm, a 97mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌400% higher power demand at 200W vs 40W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 242mm vs 145mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro P620?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P620 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 42 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro P620

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P620
Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P620's 3,698 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 449.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1443 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+449% | 3,698 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+850% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+996% | 1.478 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+15% | 1443 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 152+375% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+2426% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P620 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P620 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro P620) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (FL12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 40W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 145mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+10% | 92.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170. The Quadro P620 costs 57.4% less ($229 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 21.8 (Quadro P620) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 133.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $170-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+133% | 21.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP107 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #73 | #524 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












