
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+73.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 200W vs 40W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 200W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,715 vs 20,312).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
2021Why buy it
- ✅+73.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 200W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 200W vs 40W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,715 vs 20,312).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 22 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,715 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)'s 11,715 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 73.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.527 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1410 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+73% | 11,715 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+443% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+541% | 2.527 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+18% | 1410 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+171% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+445% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)'s 40W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 40W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 292.9+188% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | TU117 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #73 | #354 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












