
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅69.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌1011.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 18W.
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 200W, a 182W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅69.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 200W, a 182W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌1011.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 18W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 83 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)'s 14,832 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 36.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+37% | 14,832 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+443% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+433% | 3.037 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1695 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+171% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+445% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)'s 18W — a 167% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 18W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 824.0+711% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












