GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9200

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9200

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • 16184.0% more average FPS across 25 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 125895.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.

RADEON 9200

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 25 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16184.0% in average FPS across 25 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 507700% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 4), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 125895.5% (50.9 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RADEON 9200's 4 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 507700%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RADEON 9200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 (RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score
20,312+507700%
4
Architecture
Ampere
GCN 3.0
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4864+1167%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS+1960%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+63%
1024 MHz
ROPs
80+900%
8
TMUs
152+533%
24
L1 Cache
4.8 MB+5233%
0.09 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+2977%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 carries 256 MB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.13 MB (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+3100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+2977%
0.13 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RADEON 9200's 50W — a 120% difference. The RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (RADEON 9200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRADEON 9200
TDP
200W
50W-75%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
8-pin
Legacy
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
101.6+101500%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the RADEON 9200 launched at $99. On MSRP, RADEON 9200 was 75.2% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRADEON 9200
MSRP
$399
$99-75%
Performance per Dollar
50.9
0.0
Codename
GA104
Polaris 24
Release
December 1 2020
May 13 2019
Ranking
#73
#898

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.