
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

RADEON 9500
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅16878.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 25212.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅6300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌110.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 95W.
RADEON 9500
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 200W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RADEON 9500
The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RADEON 9500's 36 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 56322.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RADEON 9500 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9500). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+56322% | 36 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+138% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+296% | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+67% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+19% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+860% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 carries 128 MB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 6300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (RADEON 9500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+6300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RADEON 9500's 95W — a 71.2% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (RADEON 9500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 95W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+25300% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the RADEON 9500 launched at $179. On MSRP, RADEON 9500 was 55.1% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.2 (RADEON 9500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 25350% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $179-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+25350% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GA104 | Amethyst |
| Release | December 1 2020 | September 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #73 | #420 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














