GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9500

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9500

2015Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • 16878.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 25212.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 6300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 128 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 110.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 95W.

RADEON 9500

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $220 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 95W instead of 200W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16878.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 56322.2% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 36), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $220 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 25212.2% (50.9 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RADEON 9500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

RADEON 9500

The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RADEON 9500's 36 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 56322.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RADEON 9500 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9500). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRADEON 9500
G3D Mark Score
20,312+56322%
36
Architecture
Ampere
GCN 3.0
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4864+138%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS+296%
4.096 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+67%
1000 MHz
ROPs
80+150%
32
TMUs
152+19%
128
L1 Cache
4.8 MB+860%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRADEON 9500
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 carries 128 MB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 6300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (RADEON 9500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRADEON 9500
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+6300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RADEON 9500's 95W — a 71.2% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (RADEON 9500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRADEON 9500
TDP
200W
95W-53%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
8-pin
Legacy
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
101.6+25300%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the RADEON 9500 launched at $179. On MSRP, RADEON 9500 was 55.1% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.2 (RADEON 9500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 25350% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRADEON 9500
MSRP
$399
$179-55%
Performance per Dollar
50.9+25350%
0.2
Codename
GA104
Amethyst
Release
December 1 2020
September 29 2015
Ranking
#73
#420

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.