
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 2900 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+2977.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 2977.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
Radeon HD 2900 XT
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (660 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon HD 2900 XT
2013Why buy it
- ✅+2977.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 2977.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (660 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon HD 2900 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 2900 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 7 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon HD 2900 XT

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon HD 2900 XT
Radeon HD 2900 XT
The Radeon HD 2900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 660 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon HD 2900 XT's 660 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 2977.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 2900 XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+2978% | 660 |
| Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+913% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+2228% | 0.696 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 80+900% | 8 |
| TMUs | 152+533% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+9500% | 0.05 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 2900 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2900 XT has 1 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+700% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+20% | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs UVD+ (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD+. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 2900 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | UVD+ |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD+ |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 2900 XT's 25W — a 155.6% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 25W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+285% | 26.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 2900 XT launched at $399. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.7 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 2894.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+2894% | 1.7 |
| Codename | GA104 | Thames |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #73 | #883 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












