
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon HD8970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅282.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Radeon HD8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon HD8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅282.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon HD8970M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD8970M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 38 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon HD8970M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon HD8970M
Radeon HD8970M
The Radeon HD8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,369 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon HD8970M's 3,369 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 502.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD8970M uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD8970M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD8970M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+503% | 3,369 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+280% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+603% | 2.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+85% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+90% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+1448% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD8970M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD8970M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD8970M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon HD8970M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD8970M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon HD8970M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+201% | 33.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | Neptune |
| Release | December 1 2020 | May 14 2013 |
| Ranking | #73 | #507 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












