G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+201.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌135.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 85W.

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 85W instead of 200W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,730 vs 20,312).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019

Why buy it

✅+201.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 85W instead of 200W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌135.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 85W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,730 vs 20,312).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro 5500M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 6,730 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon Pro 5500M is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019, 201.8% more raw performance headroom, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 201.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro 5500M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro 5500M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 5500M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low	152 FPS	129 FPS
medium	137 FPS	111 FPS
high	118 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	55 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	114 FPS
medium	107 FPS	96 FPS
high	91 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	41 FPS
medium	65 FPS	37 FPS
high	50 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5500M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low	425 FPS	126 FPS
medium	366 FPS	91 FPS
high	296 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	84 FPS
medium	229 FPS	52 FPS
high	190 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	40 FPS
medium	114 FPS	28 FPS
high	96 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5500M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low	859 FPS	303 FPS
medium	693 FPS	242 FPS
high	602 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	151 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	227 FPS
medium	529 FPS	182 FPS
high	452 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	151 FPS
medium	346 FPS	121 FPS
high	275 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	76 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5500M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low	580 FPS	263 FPS
medium	514 FPS	230 FPS
high	424 FPS	195 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	151 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	197 FPS
medium	427 FPS	175 FPS
high	335 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	107 FPS
medium	266 FPS	88 FPS
high	234 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5500M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro 5500M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro 5500M

The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro 5500M's 6,730 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 201.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5500M
G3D Mark Score	20,312+202%	6,730
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4864+217%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+264%	4.454 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+15%	1450 MHz
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	152+58%	96
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5500M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5500M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5500M
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5500M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5500M
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro 5500M's 85W — a 80.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5500M
TDP	200W	85W-57%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-12%	85
Perf/Watt	101.6+28%	79.2