
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅77.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 254.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 200W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅77.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 254.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 200W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 83 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro 5700

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 11,469 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 77.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+77% | 11,469 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+111% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+160% | 6.221 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+23% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+6% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 42.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 130W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+15% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 50.1% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 253.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-50% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+253% | 14.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #73 | #238 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












