
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+293% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Radeon Pro Vega 20
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,169 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro Vega 20
2018Why buy it
- ✅+293% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,169 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro Vega 20?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 20 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 20

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 5,169 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 293%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1283 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+293% | 5,169 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+280% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+393% | 3.284 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+30% | 1283 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+90% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+1448% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+97% | 51.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 costs 100+% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 12 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #73 | #435 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












