
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+57.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,891 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌50.1% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅+57.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,891 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌50.1% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 348 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 145 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 70 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 64

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 12,891 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 57.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+58% | 12,891 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+19% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+46% | 11.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+23% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 256+68% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+380% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+97% | 51.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 33.4% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 136.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-33% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+137% | 21.5 |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #202 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












