
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+127.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 127.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,913 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅+127.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 127.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,913 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro W5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 100 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro W5500

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro W5500's 8,913 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 127.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro W5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+128% | 8,913 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+245% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+311% | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+19% | 1400 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+73% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro W5500's 125W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 125W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+42% | 71.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5500 launched at $399. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 22.3 (Radeon Pro W5500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 128.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+128% | 22.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #73 | #294 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












