
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+265.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 83.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
Radeon PRO W6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,560 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon PRO W6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅+265.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 83.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,560 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon PRO W6300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W6300 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 49 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon PRO W6300

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 5,560 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 265.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2040 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6300) with 152 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+265% | 5,560 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+533% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+417% | 3.133 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2040 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+217% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+1820% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38+217% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6300 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 155.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 25W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 222.4+119% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200. The Radeon PRO W6300 costs 49.9% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 83.1% better value. The Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $200-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+83% | 27.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 24 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #73 | #413 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












