G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 621.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 200W instead of 295W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅44.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
902.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌47.5% higher power demand at 295W vs 200W.
❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 621.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 200W instead of 295W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅44.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
902.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌47.5% higher power demand at 295W vs 200W.
❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W7900 better than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7900 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 44.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 38.9% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 48 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2020, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7900 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, 38.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 48 GB instead of 8 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020). That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W7900 is about 902.3% more expensive on MSRP at $3,999 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 44.4% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 38.9% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W7900 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $399 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon PRO W7900 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7900 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	152 FPS	262 FPS
medium	137 FPS	242 FPS
high	118 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	246 FPS
medium	107 FPS	205 FPS
high	91 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	174 FPS
medium	65 FPS	145 FPS
high	50 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	100 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	425 FPS	813 FPS
medium	366 FPS	639 FPS
high	296 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	617 FPS
medium	229 FPS	495 FPS
high	190 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	320 FPS
medium	114 FPS	256 FPS
high	96 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	191 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	859 FPS	945 FPS
medium	693 FPS	775 FPS
high	602 FPS	690 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	595 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	714 FPS
medium	529 FPS	587 FPS
high	452 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	498 FPS
medium	346 FPS	412 FPS
high	275 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	292 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	580 FPS	946 FPS
medium	514 FPS	801 FPS
high	424 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	621 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	714 FPS
medium	427 FPS	604 FPS
high	335 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	456 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	505 FPS
medium	266 FPS	437 FPS
high	234 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	317 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Radeon PRO W7900 leads by 38.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 152 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score	20,312	28,211+39%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4864	6144+26%
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS+279%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2495 MHz+50%
ROPs	80	192+140%
TMUs	152	384+153%
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+60%	3 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	6 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores	38	96+153%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 92.9% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon PRO W7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	48 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	864 GB/s+93%
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB	6 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 38.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
TDP	200W-32%	295W
Recommended PSU	600W-20%	750W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	242mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	101.6+6%	95.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 90% less ($3600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 616.9% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).