
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Radeon PRO W7900
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7900 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 621.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 295W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Radeon PRO W7900 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅43.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌902.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌47.5% higher power demand at 295W vs 200W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Radeon PRO W7900 leads by 38.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 152 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312 | 28,211+39% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864 | 6144+26% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+279% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2495 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 80 | 192+140% |
| TMUs | 152 | 384+153% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+60% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 96+153% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 carries 48 GB. Radeon PRO W7900 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 92.9% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon PRO W7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 864 GB/s+93% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 38.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-32% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+6% | 95.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti was 90% cheaper ($3600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 616.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-90% | $3999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+617% | 7.1 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 31 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #73 | #26 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














