G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅600.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 358.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅600.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 358.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro WX 3200?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti averages 600.4% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 2,209 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019, 819.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about 100.5% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and you are getting 600.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 819.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 3200 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro WX 3200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 2,209 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	152 FPS	41 FPS
medium	137 FPS	27 FPS
high	118 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	29 FPS
medium	107 FPS	17 FPS
high	91 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	10 FPS
medium	65 FPS	7 FPS
high	50 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	425 FPS	78 FPS
medium	366 FPS	49 FPS
high	296 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	22 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	24 FPS
medium	229 FPS	17 FPS
high	190 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	7 FPS
medium	114 FPS	5 FPS
high	96 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	859 FPS	99 FPS
medium	693 FPS	80 FPS
high	602 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	75 FPS
medium	529 FPS	60 FPS
high	452 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	50 FPS
medium	346 FPS	40 FPS
high	275 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	580 FPS	99 FPS
medium	514 FPS	80 FPS
high	424 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	75 FPS
medium	427 FPS	60 FPS
high	335 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	50 FPS
medium	266 FPS	40 FPS
high	234 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 3200

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 2,209 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 819.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score	20,312+820%	2,209
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 4.0
Process Node	8 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4864+660%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+1070%	1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs	80+400%	16
TMUs	152+375%	32
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+2900%	0.16 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 101.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 82°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP	200W	65W-68%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	168mm
Height	112mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75-9%	82°C
Perf/Watt	101.6+199%	34.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 costs 50.1% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 358.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).