GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Radeon Pro WX 4150
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅380.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 478.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 2,642 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 668.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1053 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+669% | 2,642 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+443% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+759% | 1.887 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+58% | 1053 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 152+171% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+2082% | 0.22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4150. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 120% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+92% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 4150 was 24.8% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 478.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $300-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+478% | 8.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Baffin |
| Release | December 1 2020 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #620 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 4150
