Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R5 330

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 330

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R5 330 Performance Spectrum

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB 200
20,312
+3783.7%
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
brand logoRTX 5000 Ada Generation
Radeon R5 330
2 GB 50
523
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 2900 GT
brand logoRadeon HD 8310E
brand logoRadeon HD 3850
brand logoRadeon HD 7550M
brand logoRadeon HD 8990
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R5 330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
low152 FPS
medium137 FPS
high118 FPS
ultra100 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 330
low13 FPS
medium8 FPS
high4 FPS
ultra3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
low425 FPS
medium366 FPS
high296 FPS
ultra248 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 330
low24 FPS
medium19 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
low859 FPS
medium693 FPS
high602 FPS
ultra457 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 330
low24 FPS
medium19 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
low580 FPS
medium514 FPS
high424 FPS
ultra373 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 330
low24 FPS
medium19 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 330
low24 FPS
medium19 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
low300 FPS
medium283 FPS
high262 FPS
ultra246 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 330
low10 FPS
medium6 FPS
high4 FPS
ultra3 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
low219 FPS
medium168 FPS
high143 FPS
ultra120 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 330
low7 FPS
medium5 FPS
high3 FPS
ultra2 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
low164 FPS
medium140 FPS
high123 FPS
ultra99 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 330
low24 FPS
medium17 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
low228 FPS
medium210 FPS
high168 FPS
ultra146 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 330
low24 FPS
medium19 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
low161 FPS
medium140 FPS
high123 FPS
ultra105 FPS
1080P
Radeon R5 330
low6 FPS
medium4 FPS
high3 FPS
ultra2 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R5 330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅2332.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Delivers 688.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $81 MSRP).
  • ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
  • ❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.

Radeon R5 330

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $318 less on MSRP ($81 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($81 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2332.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3783.7% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 523), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $318 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $81, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 688.4% (50.9 vs 6.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R5 330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon R5 330

The Radeon R5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 523 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R5 330's 523 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 3783.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R5 330 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 (Radeon R5 330). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 330). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R5 330
G3D Mark Score
20,312+3784%
523
Architecture
Ampere
GCN 3.0
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4864+1167%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS+1960%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+63%
1024 MHz
ROPs
80+900%
8
TMUs
152+533%
24
L1 Cache
4.8 MB+5233%
0.09 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+2977%
0.13 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 330 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R5 330
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 330 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 330. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 330) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R5 330
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+2977%
0.13 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R5 330). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R5 330
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (FL 11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 330).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R5 330
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
—
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R5 330's 50W — a 120% difference. The Radeon R5 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R5 330). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R5 330
TDP
200W
50W-75%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
168mm
Height
112mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75
—
Perf/Watt
101.6+868%
10.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon R5 330 launched at $81. On MSRP, Radeon R5 330 was 79.7% cheaper ($318 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6.5 (Radeon R5 330) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 683.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R5 330
MSRP
$399
$81-80%
Performance per Dollar
50.9+683%
6.5
Codename
GA104
Weston
Release
December 1 2020
April 18 2017
Ranking
#73
#873
Search GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on AmazonSearch Radeon R5 330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.