G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅1558.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 331.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $310 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅1558.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 331.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $310 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon R7 250?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti averages 1558.0% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 1,051 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R7 250 is a 2013 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013, 1832.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about 348.3% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $89 MSRP, and you are getting 1558.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1832.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R7 250 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R7 250 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R7 250 is 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 1,051 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 250 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	152 FPS	13 FPS
medium	137 FPS	8 FPS
high	118 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	3 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	7 FPS
medium	107 FPS	4 FPS
high	91 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	3 FPS
medium	65 FPS	2 FPS
high	50 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R7 250

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	425 FPS	47 FPS
medium	366 FPS	27 FPS
high	296 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	13 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	15 FPS
medium	229 FPS	9 FPS
high	190 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	5 FPS
medium	114 FPS	3 FPS
high	96 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R7 250

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	859 FPS	47 FPS
medium	693 FPS	38 FPS
high	602 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	35 FPS
medium	529 FPS	28 FPS
high	452 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	18 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	24 FPS
medium	346 FPS	19 FPS
high	275 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R7 250

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	580 FPS	47 FPS
medium	514 FPS	38 FPS
high	424 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	35 FPS
medium	427 FPS	28 FPS
high	335 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	21 FPS
medium	266 FPS	14 FPS
high	234 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R7 250

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R7 250

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R7 250's 1,051 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 1832.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R7 250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 (Radeon R7 250). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R7 250
G3D Mark Score	20,312+1833%	1,051
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4864+1167%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+1909%	0.8064 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+59%	1050 MHz
ROPs	80+900%	8
TMUs	152+533%	24
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+5233%	0.09 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 250 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R7 250
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 250) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R7 250
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 250). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R7 250
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)+8%	11.1
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R7 250
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 250's 65W — a 101.9% difference. The Radeon R7 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 300W (Radeon R7 250). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R7 250
TDP	200W	65W-68%
Recommended PSU	600W	300W-50%
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	242mm	168mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75	75
Perf/Watt	101.6+527%	16.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 250 launched at $89. The Radeon R7 250 costs 77.7% less ($310 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 331.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).