GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014Core: 720 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • 787.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 149.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $350 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.4 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 787.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1931.2% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 1,000), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $350 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 149.4% (50.9 vs 20.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 1,000 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 1931.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
G3D Mark Score
20,312+1931%
1,000
Architecture
Ampere
GCN
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4864+1167%
384

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+1500%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12_0
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
VCE 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
TDP
200W
30W-85%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
8-pin
None
Length
242mm
0mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
101.6+205%
33.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) was 87.7% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 20.4 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 149.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
MSRP
$399
$49-88%
Performance per Dollar
50.9+150%
20.4
Codename
GA104
Kaveri Spectre
Release
December 1 2020
January 14 2014
Ranking
#73
#865

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.