
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 A365
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅1932.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 610.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Radeon R7 A365
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $290 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon R7 A365
2014Why buy it
- ✅1932.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 610.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $290 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon R7 A365?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R7 A365 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 9 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R7 A365

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R7 A365
Radeon R7 A365
The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R7 A365's 781 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 2500.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R7 A365 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A365). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+2501% | 781 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+1167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+2457% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+102% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+900% | 8 |
| TMUs | 152+533% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+5233% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 A365 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A365 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A365) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 A365). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 A365).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 A365's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A365). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+291% | 26.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 A365 launched at $109. The Radeon R7 A365 costs 72.7% less ($290 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.2 (Radeon R7 A365) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 606.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $109-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+607% | 7.2 |
| Codename | GA104 | Opal |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #73 | #890 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












