GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • 859.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 967.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $230 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 859.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2420.1% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 806), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $230 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 967.4% (50.9 vs 4.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 806 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 2420.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 64 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) with 152 Tensor cores vs 128.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
G3D Mark Score
20,312+2420%
806
Architecture
Ampere
Bristol Ridge
Process Node
8 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
4864+19%
4096
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+195%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2920 MHz+75%
ROPs
80
128+60%
TMUs
152
256+68%
L2 Cache
4 MB
8 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores
38
64+68%
Tensor Cores
152+19%
128

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+1500%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
4 MB
8 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 6.0.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
TDP
200W-33%
300W
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
1mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
101.6+3663%
2.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 was 57.6% cheaper ($230 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 960.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP
$399
$169-58%
Performance per Dollar
50.9+960%
4.8
Codename
GA104
Navi 48
Release
December 1 2020
July 23 2025
Ranking
#73
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.