
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+3129.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 863.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (629 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
2025Why buy it
- ✅+3129.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 863.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (629 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 7 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 7 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 7 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 629 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B's 629 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 3129.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B uses Bristol Ridge, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 64 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) with 152 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+3129% | 629 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+19% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+195% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2920 MHz+75% |
| ROPs | 80 | 128+60% |
| TMUs | 152 | 256+68% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 64+68% |
| Tensor Cores | 152+19% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B's 300W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-33% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+4738% | 2.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B launched at $119. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B costs 70.2% less ($280 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.3 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 860.4% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $119-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+860% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 48 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #73 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












