
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+118.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,278 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌7.5% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅+118.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,278 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌7.5% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon R9 390X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 390X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 418 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 57 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R9 390X

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R9 390X's 9,278 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 118.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+119% | 9,278 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+73% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+174% | 5.914 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+59% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 176+16% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+596% | 0.69 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 390X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon R9 390X) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+17% | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 390X's 275W — a 31.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 277mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-27% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 277mm |
| Height | 112mm | 129mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+201% | 33.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 390X launched at $429. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 7% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 135.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-7% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+136% | 21.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | Grenada |
| Release | December 1 2020 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #73 | #287 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












