G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅1249.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 1269.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M275

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Radeon R9 M275

2014

Why buy it

✅1249.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 1269.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon R9 M275?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti averages 1249.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 1,115 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 M275 is a 2014 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014, 1721.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 512 MB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about 33.0% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 1249.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1721.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M275 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 M275 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 M275 is 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 1,115 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M275 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M275
1080p
low	152 FPS	22 FPS
medium	137 FPS	13 FPS
high	118 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	4 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	10 FPS
medium	107 FPS	5 FPS
high	91 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	4 FPS
medium	65 FPS	2 FPS
high	50 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M275

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M275
1080p
low	425 FPS	50 FPS
medium	366 FPS	27 FPS
high	296 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	13 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	23 FPS
medium	229 FPS	13 FPS
high	190 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	7 FPS
medium	114 FPS	4 FPS
high	96 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M275

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M275
1080p
low	859 FPS	50 FPS
medium	693 FPS	40 FPS
high	602 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	25 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	38 FPS
medium	529 FPS	30 FPS
high	452 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	19 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	25 FPS
medium	346 FPS	20 FPS
high	275 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M275

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M275
1080p
low	580 FPS	50 FPS
medium	514 FPS	40 FPS
high	424 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	25 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	36 FPS
medium	427 FPS	29 FPS
high	335 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	19 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	24 FPS
medium	266 FPS	18 FPS
high	234 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M275

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R9 M275

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 M275

The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R9 M275's 1,115 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 1721.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M275 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M275
G3D Mark Score	20,312+1722%	1,115
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4864+660%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+1268%	1.184 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+80%	925 MHz
ROPs	80+400%	16
TMUs	152+280%	40
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+2900%	0.16 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M275 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M275
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon R9 M275) — a 600% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M275) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M275
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+600%	64 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R9 M275). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M275
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (FL11_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+12%	4.1
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs UVD3 (Radeon R9 M275). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash (Radeon R9 M275).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M275
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	UVD3
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	VCE
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M275's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M275 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M275
TDP	200W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	101.6+582%	14.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M275 launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M275 costs 24.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.7 (Radeon R9 M275) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1275.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).