
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+238.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 578.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,000 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.5% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅+238.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 578.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,000 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.5% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 6 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 6,000 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 238.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire uses GCN, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+239% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+90% | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+85% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 307.2 GB/s (Dual) (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — a 45.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit (Dual).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+46% | 307.2 GB/s (Dual) |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit (Dual)+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 200W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+239% | 30.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire launched at $800. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 50.1% less ($401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.5 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 578.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-50% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+579% | 7.5 |
| Codename | GA104 | Neptune CF |
| Release | December 1 2020 | March 1 2014 |
| Ranking | #73 | #348 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












