
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1016.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 739.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M360
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,819 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon R9 M360
2015Why buy it
- ✅+1016.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 739.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,819 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon R9 M360?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M360 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 20 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 11 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R9 M360

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 M360
Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R9 M360's 1,819 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 1016.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+1017% | 1,819 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+850% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+1610% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+80% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 152+375% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+3592% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M360 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M360 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M360) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+318% | 24.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M360 costs 24.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6.1 (Radeon R9 M360) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 734.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $300-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+734% | 6.1 |
| Codename | GA104 | Tropo |
| Release | December 1 2020 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #73 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












