G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+918.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 665.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M385X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,994 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Radeon R9 M385X

2015

Why buy it

✅+918.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 665.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,994 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon R9 M385X?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 1,994 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 M385X is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015, 918.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 512 MB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about 33.0% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 918.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M385X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 M385X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 M385X is 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 1,994 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M385X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	152 FPS	36 FPS
medium	137 FPS	22 FPS
high	118 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	8 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	24 FPS
medium	107 FPS	14 FPS
high	91 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	9 FPS
medium	65 FPS	6 FPS
high	50 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M385X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	425 FPS	57 FPS
medium	366 FPS	31 FPS
high	296 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	16 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	28 FPS
medium	229 FPS	15 FPS
high	190 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	8 FPS
medium	114 FPS	5 FPS
high	96 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M385X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	859 FPS	90 FPS
medium	693 FPS	72 FPS
high	602 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	67 FPS
medium	529 FPS	54 FPS
high	452 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	45 FPS
medium	346 FPS	36 FPS
high	275 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M385X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	580 FPS	63 FPS
medium	514 FPS	52 FPS
high	424 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	37 FPS
medium	427 FPS	31 FPS
high	335 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	25 FPS
medium	266 FPS	20 FPS
high	234 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M385X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R9 M385X

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 M385X

The Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,994 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 1,994 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 918.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M385X uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385X). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
G3D Mark Score	20,312+919%	1,994
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4864+443%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+722%	1.971 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+51%	1100 MHz
ROPs	80+400%	16
TMUs	152+171%	56
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+2082%	0.22 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M385X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385X has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M385X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M385X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M385X). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M385X).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M385X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
TDP	200W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-12%	85
Perf/Watt	101.6+282%	26.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M385X launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M385X costs 24.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6.6 (Radeon R9 M385X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 671.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).