
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 470/570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅104.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 14.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 242mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅104.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 14.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 242mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX 470/570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 470/570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 89 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 470/570

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 470/570
Radeon RX 470/570
The Radeon RX 470/570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1206 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,935 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 7,935 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 156%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 470/570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470/570). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4.94 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470/570). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1206 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+156% | 7,935 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+138% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+228% | 4.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+38% | 1206 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+19% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+860% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 470/570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470/570) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 470/570) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 470/570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470/570). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 470/570).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 120W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 470/570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 450W (Radeon RX 470/570). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 120W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+54% | 66.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 470/570 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 470/570 costs 55.1% less ($220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 470/570) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 14.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $179-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+15% | 44.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | Ellesmere |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #73 | #315 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












