
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+137.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 36.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 242mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,546 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅+137.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 36.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 242mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,546 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX 480?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 480 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 96 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 480

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX 480's 8,546 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 137.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+138% | 8,546 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+111% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+178% | 5.834 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+32% | 1266 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+6% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+757% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 480 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+75% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 150W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+78% | 57.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 480 costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 36.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $229-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+36% | 37.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | Ellesmere |
| Release | December 1 2020 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #73 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












