GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon RX 5300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+302.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌135.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 85W.

Radeon RX 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 85W instead of 200W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,044 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Radeon RX 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅+302.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 85W instead of 200W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌135.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 85W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,044 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX 5300M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 5,044 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon RX 5300M is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019, 302.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 3 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 302.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon RX 5300M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX 5300M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 5300M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX 5300M
1080p
low	152 FPS	99 FPS
medium	137 FPS	82 FPS
high	118 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	85 FPS
medium	107 FPS	71 FPS
high	91 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	28 FPS
medium	65 FPS	27 FPS
high	50 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon RX 5300M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX 5300M
1080p
low	425 FPS	112 FPS
medium	366 FPS	78 FPS
high	296 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	35 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	76 FPS
medium	229 FPS	46 FPS
high	190 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	24 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	34 FPS
medium	114 FPS	22 FPS
high	96 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon RX 5300M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX 5300M
1080p
low	859 FPS	227 FPS
medium	693 FPS	182 FPS
high	602 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	113 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	170 FPS
medium	529 FPS	136 FPS
high	452 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	113 FPS
medium	346 FPS	91 FPS
high	275 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	57 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon RX 5300M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX 5300M
1080p
low	580 FPS	163 FPS
medium	514 FPS	134 FPS
high	424 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	114 FPS
medium	427 FPS	94 FPS
high	335 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	64 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	65 FPS
medium	266 FPS	53 FPS
high	234 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon RX 5300M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 5300M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 5300M

The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX 5300M's 5,044 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 302.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1445 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX 5300M
G3D Mark Score	20,312+303%	5,044
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4864+245%	1408
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+298%	4.069 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+15%	1445 MHz
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	152+73%	88
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5300M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5300M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX 5300M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300M has 3 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 168 GB/s (Radeon RX 5300M) — a 166.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX 5300M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+167%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+167%	168 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+167%	96-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 5300M's 85W — a 80.7% difference. The Radeon RX 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.