
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+351.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 12% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,500 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.5 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅+351.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 12% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,500 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.5 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX 560 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 560 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 51 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 4,500 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 351.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+351% | 4,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+375% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+558% | 2.462 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+31% | 1275 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 152+138% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+1820% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 65W — a 101.9% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 65W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+47% | 69.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) costs 75.2% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 45.5 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 11.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $99-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+12% | 45.5 |
| Codename | GA104 | Baffin |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #478 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












