
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+129.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,857 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon RX 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+129.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,857 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX 5600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 100 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 65 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 5600M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
The Radeon RX 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,857 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX 5600M's 8,857 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 129.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+129% | 8,857 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+111% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+178% | 5.829 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+32% | 1265 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+6% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600M has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600M) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+56% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600M). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 5600M's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 150W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+72% | 59.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












