GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6300M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6300M

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6300M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • 215.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 215.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 216.3% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 6,421), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is limited to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 8nm, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6300M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 6,421 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 216.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6300M) with 152 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score
20,312+216%
6,421
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
4864+533%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS+340%
3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2400 MHz+44%
ROPs
80+150%
32
TMUs
152+217%
48
L1 Cache
4.8 MB+1820%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
38+217%
12

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300M carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) — a 600% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s+600%
64 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+700%
32-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6300M
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6300M
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
Navi 24 Media
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6300M
TDP
200W
35W-83%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
8-pin
Mobile
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
101.6
183.5+81%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300M (2022 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6300M
MSRP
$399
Codename
GA104
Navi 24
Release
December 1 2020
January 4 2022
Ranking
#73
#379

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.