
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 8050S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+25.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 26% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
Radeon RX 8050S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,167 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon RX 8050S
2025Why buy it
- ✅+25.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 26% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,167 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX 8050S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 8050S make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 8050S

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 8050S
Radeon RX 8050S
The Radeon RX 8050S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2800 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,167 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX 8050S's 16,167 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 25.6%. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 32 (Radeon RX 8050S). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+26% | 16,167 |
| Shading Units | 4864+15100% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2800 MHz+68% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 8050S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 8050S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 8050S has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 256 GB/s (Max) (Radeon RX 8050S) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs System Shared.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | none |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5X (Shared) |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+75% | 256 GB/s (Max) |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System Shared |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 8050S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon RX 8050S). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 8050S).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 8050S's 55W — a 113.7% difference. The Radeon RX 8050S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 8050S). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 55W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 293.9+189% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 8050S launched at $400. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 0.3% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 40.4 (Radeon RX 8050S) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 26% better value. The Radeon RX 8050S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+26% | 40.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | — |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #73 | #149 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












