GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Radeon X1600 Pro
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon X1600 Pro Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon X1600 Pro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon X1600 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅8389.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 7561.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
- ❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.
Radeon X1600 Pro
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon X1600 Pro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Radeon X1600 Pro
The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 99 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 20417.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon X1600 Pro uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+20417% | 99 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+138% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+154% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+7% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+19% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1600 Pro leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 Pro carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 Pro. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 9.0c (Radeon X1600 Pro). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+33% | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+119% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs None (Radeon X1600 Pro). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs Avivo. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon X1600 Pro).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon X1600 Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 150W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 168mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+14414% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon X1600 Pro launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon X1600 Pro was 62.7% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.7 (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 7171.4% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $149-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+7171% | 0.7 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #73 | #216 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon X1600 Pro
