GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 3060 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • 21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 323.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,312 vs 24,046).
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

  • +18.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 401% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Yes. RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 18.4% higher PassMark G3D performance and 192 vs 152 Tensor cores. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2020, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, 18.4% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is about 401.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,999 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 18.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
Is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $399 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX 4000 Ada Generation earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low152 FPS123 FPS
medium137 FPS115 FPS
high118 FPS96 FPS
ultra100 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low131 FPS102 FPS
medium107 FPS89 FPS
high91 FPS72 FPS
ultra82 FPS63 FPS
4K
low77 FPS56 FPS
medium65 FPS50 FPS
high50 FPS39 FPS
ultra43 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low425 FPS495 FPS
medium366 FPS418 FPS
high296 FPS328 FPS
ultra248 FPS283 FPS
1440p
low272 FPS338 FPS
medium229 FPS279 FPS
high190 FPS227 FPS
ultra156 FPS190 FPS
4K
low133 FPS165 FPS
medium114 FPS138 FPS
high96 FPS120 FPS
ultra73 FPS97 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low859 FPS549 FPS
medium693 FPS468 FPS
high602 FPS396 FPS
ultra457 FPS333 FPS
1440p
low658 FPS434 FPS
medium529 FPS367 FPS
high452 FPS315 FPS
ultra343 FPS260 FPS
4K
low434 FPS271 FPS
medium346 FPS225 FPS
high275 FPS187 FPS
ultra221 FPS149 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low580 FPS401 FPS
medium514 FPS332 FPS
high424 FPS301 FPS
ultra373 FPS277 FPS
1440p
low478 FPS313 FPS
medium427 FPS261 FPS
high335 FPS236 FPS
ultra290 FPS214 FPS
4K
low285 FPS179 FPS
medium266 FPS156 FPS
high234 FPS142 FPS
ultra195 FPS123 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 18.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 152 Tensor cores vs 192.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score
20,312
24,046+18%
Architecture
Ampere
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
4864
6144+26%
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS+65%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+7%
1560 MHz
ROPs
80+25%
64
TMUs
152
192+26%
L1 Cache
4.8 MB
6 MB+25%
L2 Cache
4 MB
48 MB+1100%
Ray Tracing Cores
38
48+26%
Tensor Cores
152
192+26%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 24.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s+24%
360 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+60%
160-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB
48 MB+1100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
8th Gen NVENC (3x)
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
TDP
200W
70W-65%
Recommended PSU
600W-20%
750W
Power Connector
8-pin
1x 8-pin
Length
242mm
267mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
101.6
343.5+238%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 80% less ($1600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 324.2% better value. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP
$399-80%
$1999
Performance per Dollar
50.9+324%
12.0
Codename
GA104
AD104
Release
December 1 2020
August 9 2023
Ranking
#73
#47