GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • 21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 323.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,312 vs 24,046).
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

  • +18.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 401% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX 4000 Ada Generation instead at 24,046 vs 20,312, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is limited to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, 48 vs 38 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,600 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 323.2% (50.9 vs 12.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, RTX 4000 Ada Generation has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 18.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 152 Tensor cores vs 192.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score
20,312
24,046+18%
Architecture
Ampere
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
4864
6144+26%
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS+65%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+7%
1560 MHz
ROPs
80+25%
64
TMUs
152
192+26%
L1 Cache
4.8 MB
6 MB+25%
L2 Cache
4 MB
48 MB+1100%
Ray Tracing Cores
38
48+26%
Tensor Cores
152
192+26%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 24.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 160-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s+24%
360 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+60%
160-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB
48 MB+1100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
8th Gen NVENC (3x)
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
TDP
200W
70W-65%
Recommended PSU
600W-20%
750W
Power Connector
8-pin
1x 8-pin
Length
242mm
267mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
101.6
343.5+238%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti came in at $399, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti was 80% cheaper ($1600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 324.2% better value. The newer card here is RTX 4000 Ada Generation (2023 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP
$399-80%
$1999
Performance per Dollar
50.9+324%
12.0
Codename
GA104
AD104
Release
December 1 2020
August 9 2023
Ranking
#73
#47

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.