
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 323.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,312 vs 24,046).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅+18.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌401% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 323.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+18.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,312 vs 24,046).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌401% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 97 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 123 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 18.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 152 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312 | 24,046+18% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864 | 6144+26% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+7% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 192+26% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB | 6 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 48+26% |
| Tensor Cores | 152 | 192+26% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 24.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+24% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 70W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 343.5+238% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 80% less ($1600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 324.2% better value. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-80% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+324% | 12.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | AD104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #73 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












